You are not connected. Please login or register

G-Man & Mark975 Vs Shivam & Yin [Voting]

G-Man & Mark975 Vs Shivam & Yin

50% 50% [ 2 ]
50% 50% [ 2 ]
Total Votes : 4

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1 G-Man & Mark975 Vs Shivam & Yin [Voting] on Sat Jun 15, 2013 11:59 am

Zenesis

avatar

G-Man & Mark975 Vs Shivam & Yin





G-Man + Mark975

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


Shivam + Yin

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


Please post who you voted for or your vote won't count.
Please do not vote for yourself.


You Have 5 Days To Vote
Happy Voting Cool

2 Re: G-Man & Mark975 Vs Shivam & Yin [Voting] on Sat Jun 15, 2013 12:17 pm

Mario

avatar
Lightning
Voted g man and mark.



[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Zenesis

avatar
Voted Shivam + Yin

need some more depth
nice combination color (blue & orange)
nice text
no light source
sharpen a bit more
apply some adjustment (vibrance/brightness & gradient map)
KIU

G-Man + Mark975 entry look nice too but :

BG look messy (big problem)
quality look bad (big problem)
need some more depth
kinda bright
nice animation
KIU

Midnight-Jasper

avatar
lol, that animation is really cute! 
Both sigs are a bit too over-exposed for my liking.

For G bro and Mark's the right side of the sig does look great, but it's veeery busy and confusing to the eye. Props for darkening borders though which is important to me for the sig looking complete.

I will vote for Shivam and Yin, the blending and contrast is done very nicely (though as I said that background is still too bright for me Razz). Borders please. And sharpening the focal would make it look a lot better.

That animation is wonderful though. It would look really good if implemented better with the sig, like running along a platform created in the sig or having some kind of C4Dish trail there or something.

5 Re: G-Man & Mark975 Vs Shivam & Yin [Voting] on Sat Jun 15, 2013 11:54 pm

Maxlance

avatar
Lightning
Very difficult choice for me...


Gman+Mark:

Gman + Mark

1)Naruto render is magical , so are the shine effects..

2)But the mistakes are absence of clarity , improper blending of C4D causing Large messiness in right side and flow absence

3)ABSENCE OF MINI RASENSHURIKEN IN NARUTO'S FINGERS MAKES IT LOOK EMPTY..Mark could have added rasenshuriken animation...

4)Gladly,animation makes up for some of the defects..



Siggy without the C4Ds(As Gman had shown me) : 5/5 {But this rating won't count as the siggy was modified...}







Shivam+Yin:

Shivam+Yin

1)This siggy also has defects ..
2)The biggest defect is that the center of the siggy lacks blending..The demarcation is clearly visible !
3)Sasuke's chidori is better made than naruto's "rasengan thingy" because that Naruto's thingy is OVER-ILLUMINATED !
4)Secondary black colour texts are improper and don't fit well !




Vote:

My score:

Gman+mark

Siggy : 2.5/5
+1 for animation !

Overall : 3.5/5

Shivam+Yin

Siggy : 2/5
Overall : 2/5



My vote: Gman+Mark











For Gman+Mark:

btw, In Gman + Mark's signature,

 1)Mark made it excellent by adding animation ..

 2)At the same time..Mark destroyed its effects by adding C4Ds..

3)Mark's C4D style is to make the render rest in C4Ds (like in Samus siggy where it worked well) but not here as naruto render is standing,not in a rest or falling mode..

4)So remember that adding C4Ds is no harm..Don't hesitate to do it ..BUT the right C4D choice is Very very important...



As MJ said :

"It would look really good if implemented better with the sig, like running along a platform created in the sig or having some kind of C4Dish trail there or something."






For Shivam+Yin:

Shivam+Yin

Sasuke's chidori's lighting after-effect doesn't show up on the main Sasuke render..The snake wasn't modified much..

More could have been added to the siggy..



[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Sponsored content


View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum